breaking news
  • President Trump Is Right to Get Tough on Maduro—But the Endgame Must Be Flawless
  • Attorney General James and Tenant Harassment Prevention Task Force Secure More than $672,000 from NYC Landlord for Creating Unsafe Living Conditions for Tenants
  • Why Macron's China visit might be good for India
  • China wants revenge: Chinese virologist who linked Covid to Wuhan lab is scared
  • Trump says Zelenskyy isn't ready to accept US peace plan to end war in Ukraine
  • U.S. to mandate checks of some tourists’ social media history from past 5 years

View Details

US Will Now Scrutinise Social Media Before Granting Immigration Benefits




The Trump administration has introduced a new policy requiring immigration officials to screen social media accounts for antisemitic content, which could lead to the denial of immigration benefits.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem "has made it clear that anyone who thinks they can come to America and hide behind the First Amendment to advocate for anti-Semitic violence and terrorism — think again," she added. "You are not welcome here."
The policy applies to immigrants seeking lawful permanent residence, foreign students, and those “affiliated with educational institutions linked to antisemitic activity”. Officials will assess social media content indicating endorsement, promotion, or support of antisemitic terrorism, organisations, or activities, and positive findings may negatively impact immigration applications.
According to the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the policy will consider social media content that indicates an immigrant is "endorsing, espousing, promoting, or supporting antisemitic terrorism, antisemitic terrorist organisations, or other antisemitic activity" as a negative factor in their application.
This means that immigrants who have expressed support for groups like Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Hezbollah, or Ansar Allah (also known as the Houthis) on social media may be denied immigration benefits.
Free speech advocacy groups, such as the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), argue that the policy may punish individuals for expressing political opinions, creating a chilling effect on speech, according to a report by The Washington Post. Tyler Coward, lead counsel for government affairs at FIRE, stated, "The government already does a lot of screening of individuals seeking to enter the country, but with this policy, it seems to basically punish individuals for expressing political opinions." Coward also noted that the policy leaves too much room for interpretation, which could lead to potential abuse.

Immigration attorneys, like Stephen Yale-Loehr, note that the policy's discretionary nature may lead to inconsistent application and severe consequences for immigrants. Yale-Loehr stated, "When U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services denies an application based on its own discretion, it's very hard to overcome that. You have to try and litigate those, and that's always time-consuming and expensive”, per the report by The Washington Post.